The situation
Different teams may hold separate parts of the same matter. Notes, correspondence and accounts need to be assembled into a chronology before the organisation can assess what happened and the roles involved.
Service
We help businesses and law firms examine suspected misconduct, conflicts of interest and information leaks. We connect documents, human accounts and digital traces to test competing versions of events.
Different teams may hold separate parts of the same matter. Notes, correspondence and accounts need to be assembled into a chronology before the organisation can assess what happened and the roles involved.
The scope follows the question and the material available.
We organise the material and identify competing accounts. The client’s account is a hypothesis to test, not an assumed conclusion.
We place documents, traces and accounts in time. Where timing cannot be established, we state that limitation.
We compare alternative explanations against the material, including information that challenges an initial view.
The reconstruction includes unresolved points and why they could not be explained.
A reconstruction of events with the basis and confidence level of each finding and the areas requiring further examination.
We agree the form of the deliverable and the scope of recommendations before work begins. The outcome includes limitations and questions that remain unresolved.